Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
Article Info
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose شماره 67

volume Number : 14
number In Volume : 9
issue Number : 67

Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 14، number In Volume 9، ، issue Number 67

The artistic aspect of Mujir al-Din Bilqani's satirical similes

Mohammadi Saeedi Moghaddam (Author in Charge), Seyyed Ahmad Parsa

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the lyrical literary manifestations in Mojir al-Din Bilqani"s poems is his satires. These satires, along with Khaghani"s satires, have been forgotten and not studied. For this reason, the present study tries to eliminate immoral satires, introduce satire and mention the reasons for its existence in Mujir al-Din"s poems, and identify his rhetorical technique.

METHODOLOGY: The method of this research is descriptive-analytical and the data have been collected using library resources. The study area and society is a collection of poems by the divan of Mojir al-Din Bilqani, which has been published by the Institute of History and Culture of Iran with the correction and suspension of Mohammad Abadi.

FINDINGS: The results of the research show that the language of Mujir"s satires is chaste and often away from insults with taboo words. Her satires are mostly related to opponents and rivals and in this case, simile is the most important imaginative image and poetic element of Mujir. The mind of the illustrator Mujir al-Din is not content to bring one image and his similes are mixed with other images. Also, he has tried to show his superiority with allegorical expressions based on similes. This has reduced the ugliness of his satires and increased their rhetorical aspect.

CONCLUSION: In his satirical similes, the poet has established a poetic connection between unrelated elements and has forced the audience"s mind to try. Therefore, his satires have an artistic aspect. In terms of meaning, his satires reflect the social situation and morality that govern society. Therefore, the satires of Mujir al-Din Bilqani, in addition to their artistic aspect, are significant in terms of meaning.

Keyword
Mujir al-Din Bilqani , Sixth century AH , Satir , Rhetoric , Simile

Reference
  • Al-Fakhouri, H. (2004). History of Arabic literature from the pre-Islamic era to the contemporary century, translated by Abdul Mohammad Ayati, sixth edition, Tehran: Toos, p.42.
  • Bilqani, M. (1979). Poetry Divan, edited and suspended by Mohammad Abadi, Tabriz: Institute of History and Culture of Iran.
  • Dad, S. (2011). Dictionary of Literary Terms, Fifth Edition, Tehran: Morvarid, p.535.
  • Daneshpajooh, M. (2002). Literary fanaticism in Persian poetry, Tehran: Tahoori, p. 411.
  • Dolatshah Samarkandi. (2003). Tazkereh al-Sho'ra, by Edward Brown, Tehran: Asatir, p. 115.
  • Forouzanfar, B. (2008). Speakers and orators, Tehran: Zavar, p. 577.
  • Fotouhi, M. (2016). Picture Rhetoric, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Sokhan, p. 92.
  • Halabi, A. (1998). Humor and Satir in Iran and the Islamic world, Tehran: Behbahani, p. 39.
  • Hashemi, S. M & Musaffa, M. (2017). "Stylistics of Anvari Abivardi's satires", Specialized Journal of Stylistics of Persian Order and Prose (Bahar Adab), 10 (36), pp.1-19.
  • Horri, A. (2011). About Humor (New Approaches to Humor and Satir), Fourth Edition, Tehran: Sureh Mehr, p. 35.
  • Ibn Manzoor, M. (1990). Arabic Language, Beirut: Dar Al-Sadr, p. 353.
  • Iqbal Ashtiani, A. (1968). Obaid Zakani's satires and jokes (including in-depth and meticulous articles on the nature of satire) by Anatoly Lunacharsky, Tabriz: Ibn Sina, p. 10.
  • Khanlari, Z. (2005). Dictionary of Persian Literature, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Toos, p. 451.
  • Mahjoub, M. (1966). Khorasani style in Persian poetry, Tehran: Ferdowsi, p. 84.
  • Ma'loof Yasui, L. (1995). Al-Munajid, Tehran: Dehaghani.
  • Niko Bakht, N. (2001). Satire in Persian Poetry, Tehran: University of Tehran, p. 182.
  • Parsa, S.A. (2016). The main stylistic features of Suzani-Samarkand's satire, Mirror of Heritage, Spring and Summer, 14 (58), pp. 173-192.
  • Parsa, S.A. & Moradi, F. (2008). Comparison of the style of satire in Khaghani and Mutenabi divans, Journal of Humanities, No. 58, pp. 1-22.
  • Pournamdarian, T. (2002). Trip in fog, Second Edition, Tehran: Negah, p. 159.
  • Safa. Z. (2012). History of Literature in Iran, Volume II, Eighteenth Edition, Tehran: Ferdows, pp. 354-355.
  • Salajaghe, P. (2011). An Inquiry into the Functioning of Animal Symbols in the Poems of Saeb Tabrizi and Bidel Dehlavi, Quarterly Journal of Persian Language and Literature Research, No. 21, pp. 140-121.
  • Shafi'ei Kadkani, M. (1993). Mofles Kimiaforoosh, Tehran: Sokhan, p. 52.
  • Zarghani, M. (2009). Literary History of Iran and the Realm of Persian Language: The Evolution and Transformation of Genres until the Middle of the Fifth Century, Tehran: Sokhan, pp. 386-387.
  • Zarinkub, A. (1982). Literary Criticism, Volume One, Third Edition, Tehran: Amir Kabir, p. 217.